Subscribe RSS

Posts Tagged ‘Problem Solving’

Does brainstorming still have value

June 11th, 2009 by Steve Swann | 2 Comments | Filed in Business, Problem Solving, Thinking

In a recent post I posed  the question:

Does “business” actually have the capacity to deliver on the innovation promise? (click to read)

Often, when a business wants to jump into the innovation lane their first stop is a brainstorming session. “Ahhhhh, not again” I hear you say!! (No wonder innovation is so toothless….)

Well you are not the only one who cringes at the thought. I’ve seen quite a bit of commentary recently on the subject. A good article that discussed the Pro’s and Con’s was written by Mark McGuiness at Lateral Action. Another more recent is from Business Week – Brainstorming for Better Business – which gives some real life examples of brainstorming in action.

From my perspectives Brainstorming is an effective part in a process, and should not be viewed as a singular isolated event. By this I mean that there has to be some type of “focus” prior to the brainstorming to make sure it addresses the right problem. This helps keep the ideation on track.

Following the brainstorming is evaluation and the same people need to be involved. This helps train the participants to think of future ideas within the evaluation criteria – thereby improving the quality and effectiveness of future sessions.Those that use brainstorming regularly and embed it in their working practices become effective at it, and find it valuable. Those who view it as a chore or an ineffective practice end up making it so.

Several weeks ago I saw this illustration. In the accompanying article it explained how some items travel along a “Value” path and ultimately pass through a trough where they have so little value that they are actively trashed. I think that brainstorming is in this part of the cycle. Hopefully this useful tool’s value will again be appreciated.

where is brainstorming in the value trough?

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Technorati Favorites
  • MySpace
  • Delicious
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Squidoo
  • Share/Bookmark

Related Posts:

Tags: , ,

Innovation fails to deliver in the US

June 9th, 2009 by Steve Swann | 1 Comment | Filed in Business, Innovation, Inspiration

I recently read a great article from Business Week‘s head economist Michael Mandel. In the article400px-la_defense_-_stairway_to_heaven he looks at the impact – or rather the non-impact – of innovation in the United States and world economy. He even suggests that the lack of commerialized innovation over the last decade could be considered as a contributing factor in the prevailing economic climate.

I’ve read and listened to many good debates on the causes of the current economic climate (including this one from CUNY). This is the first time that innovation, or the lack of it, has been suggested to have had such an impact.

There have been many commentators appealing to the business community to keep investing in innovation. But if we take Michael Mandel’s assertions to be correct it leaves us with one important question:

Does “business” actually have the capacity to deliver on the innovation promise?

One good thing from the current financial situation that might help is that businesses are being forced to be more effective through efficiency. There’s no fat on the plate anymore!

This is and will continue to force changes in thinking, changes in business models, and hopefully changes in how innovation is viewed, valued and invested in by business.

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Technorati Favorites
  • MySpace
  • Delicious
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Squidoo
  • Share/Bookmark

Related Posts:

Tags: , , ,

Do you need a problem to innovate?

June 8th, 2009 by Steve Swann | 3 Comments | Filed in Great Design, Problem Solving

I spotted this design for a combination door handle and lock from a Yanko design feed. What I really like about it is that it does two things really well.

Firstly, I solves a problem that I didn’t know existed. And, secondly it does more with less.

Let me explain.

  1. Solves a problem the doesn’t really exist: With so much turmoil in the world with financial meltdowns, energy and climate crisises, and war and famine; does re-designing an door hand and a lock really make a difference? I mean is it really a problem that we have a handle and a lock, and have to manually reshuffle the combination. I don’t have an answer other than I don’t think it matters anyway. The fact that designers can see ways to improve everyday things is good enough for me.
  2. Do more with less: Combining objects and functions into a new design is a great pathway to innovation. This design does it well. There is physically less hardware (less cost?), setting the combination can be done while your hand is on the handle (less effort), and you don’t even have to reshuffle the combination when finished (less thinking!).

numlock_01




  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Technorati Favorites
  • MySpace
  • Delicious
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Squidoo
  • Share/Bookmark

Related Posts:

Tags: ,